Journal of Socio-Cultural Studies of Khorasan

Journal of Socio-Cultural Studies of Khorasan

Identifying and Analyzing Effective Cultural Drivers of Development in the South Khorasan Province: The Components of Public Culture in Focus

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Political Geography, University of Birjand, Iran (Corresponding Author)
2 -, Associate Professor of Rural Geography, University of Birjand
3 MA in Political Geography, University of Birjand, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Clark (2006) argues that wherever there is a successful development experience, there is also a specific culture that has a unique way of viewing humans, the world, human activity, noble work, and human mission on Earth. Southern Khorasan province is considered one of the least developed provinces in Iran, and there is a variety of opinions and views about the causes of this underdevelopment. While underdevelopment can be attributed to a variety of political, economic, and geographic factors, this research aims to investigate the role of culture in shaping underdevelopment by evaluating and measuring the role of dominant public cultural components in Southern Khorasan province. In essence, this research seeks to identify the key public cultural drivers that either hinder or support the province’s development process. To achieve this goal, the following three key questions will be addressed to some extent based on the information collected during the survey:

What are the most important public cultural characteristics of Southern Khorasan that favor and promote development?
What are the most important public cultural characteristics of Southern Khorasan that hinder development?

To what extent have the province’s cultural capacities been used to promote development in Southern Khorasan?
   Methods
This applied, descriptive-analytical research used a mixed-methods approach, including literature review, library research, and survey. The target population was experts on culture and development. The Cochran formula was used to estimate the sample size, which was determined to be 30. A simple random sampling method was used to select the sample. A researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire was first validated by a group of experts (n = 8). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was then used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire, which yielded values of 0.78 and 0.89 for the characteristics of general culture in favor of development and as an obstacle to development, respectively. Once the questionnaires were distributed and collected, appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics (group t-test and Friedman test) were used to analyze the data and test the hypotheses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 software.
 Findings
The first and second questions were exploratory in nature and aimed to identify the cultural features and characteristics that support or hinder the development of the public culture. The data were collected from the elites and the survey respondents. The results showed that the top 10 traits and features of a public culture that fosters development were, in order of priority: 1. History of education and training regarding public culture, 2. The spirit of tolerance and acceptance (interaction between Shi’ite and Sunni), 3. Respect for the social order and the rights of others, 4. High sense of responsibility among the people, 5. Collective spirit for the development of the province, 6. Mutual respect and hospitality, 7. Self-governance of the people of the province, 8. The role of professional commitment or conscientiousness, 9. Observance of citizenship rights in the province, and 10. Adherence to customs and traditions.
The results of the second question showed that the 10 most important features and characteristics of a public culture that impedes development were, in order of priority: 1. People’s local biases, 2. Tendency to save and reluctance to invest in construction and development projects, 3. People’s preference for non-native managers, 4. Excessive complacency of the people of the province, 5. Conservatism and caution (political caution), 6. Factional and group thinking, 7. Culture of confrontation and excessive compliments in the province, 8. Localism, 9. Law-abiding spirit, and 10. People’s lack of political knowledge and awareness.
 Discussion
The research results and findings show that: 1. The history of education and training in the field of public culture, 2. The spirit of tolerance and acceptance (interaction between Shia and Sunni), 3. Respect for the social order and the rights of others, and 4. High sense of responsibility among the people are some of the most important aspects of public culture in Southern Khorasan province that support and promote development. The greatest treasures of Southern Khorasan province are not only saffron, barberry, and jujube, but also “culture and politeness” of its people. However, along with the favorable factors for development, there are some aspects of public culture in the province that hinder development, one of the most important of which is people’s local prejudices. Local prejudices refer to a situation where people’s view of development is more based on their own interests than on the real needs of different geographical areas (a macro view of the province’s issues), resulting in bargaining and rent-seeking or people’s excessive attachment to a place (a partial and local view) that leads to unequal distribution of facilities, services, and resources in the territory. The second aspect of public culture that acts as a barrier to development in the province is the tendency to save and the reluctance to invest in construction and development projects. The third influential aspect as a barrier to development in the field of public culture is people’s preference for non-native managers in South Khorasan province. Also, the factors of excessive complacency of the people of the province and conservatism and caution (political caution) play a role as the fourth and fifth factors of underdevelopment of the province from the perspective of public culture.
Keywords

Subjects


References
- Ahmadian, M. A. (1995). Joghrafiaye shahrestan-e Birjand [Geography of Birjand city]. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publishing House. [In Persian]
- Akhtar, M. (2004). Sarzamin-e talaye sorkh [The land of red gold]. Tehran: Arad Nagar Designers Company. [In Persian]
- Babaei Fard, A. (2010). Tose'eh farhangi va tose'eh ejtma'i dar Iran [Cultural development and social development in Iran]. Social Welfare Quarterly, 10(37), 7-56. [In Persian]
- Barfi, M. (2013). Simaye shaykhin dar ayene-ye she'r-e Farsi [Sheikhin's image in the mirror of Persian poetry]. Tehran: Moalef. [In Persian]
- Carmines, E., & D’Amico, N. (2015). The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 205–216.
- Clark, D. A. (2006). The Elgar companion to development studies. University of Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute.
- Collier, P. (2017). Culture, politics, and economic development. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(3), 111–125.
- Goharipour, M. (2009). Ma'na va mafhoom-e farhang-e omumi dar parto-ye mafhoom-e jahane momken [The meaning and concept of public culture in the light of the concept of possible worlds]. Cultural Research Journal, 10(7), 137-172. [In Persian]
- Guiso, L., Paola, S., & Luigi, Z. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48.
- Heydari, A. (2000). Zafe farhang-e eqtesadi va ta'sir-e an bar tose'eh eqtesadi dar keshvarha-ye tose'eh-niyaftah ba ta'kid bar Iran [The weakness of economic culture and its impact on economic development in developing countries with an emphasis on Iran] (Unpublished master's thesis). Central Tehran Islamic Azad University. [In Persian]
- Keller, H. (2020). Culture and social development. In Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press.
- Leftwich, A. (2003). Democracy and development (A. A. Qalian & A. Khakbaz, Trans.). New Design. (Original work published 2003).
- Lopez-Claros, A., & Perotti, V. (2014). Does culture matter for development? Policy Research Working Paper Series (No. 7092). The World Bank.
- Marana, M. (2010). Culture and development evolution and prospects. In M. Mancisidor, O. Andueza, T. Anuzita, L. Vega, M. Hernando, L. Moreno, N. Uribe & R. Iñiguez (Eds.), UNESCO Etxea. Working Papers (No. 1). UNESCO Center of the Basque Country.
- Moghtadai, A., & Rai, K. (2012). Shoraye farhang-e omumi va ta'sire mosavabehay-e an bar siyastgozari va barnamerizi-e farhangi [Council of Public Culture and the effect of its resolutions on policy making and cultural planning]. Quarterly Journal of Communication Culture Studies, 14(55), 57-93. [In Persian]
- Moheb Hosseini, M. (2013). Naghshe va jayegahe farhang dar tose'e-ye payedar [The role and position of culture in sustainable development]. Tehran: Iranian Anthropological Association. [In Persian]
- Musapour, N. (1997). Farhang-e omumi, shivahaye bahgesht [Public Culture, The Ways of Heaven]. General Culture Quarterly, 24(13), 106-130. [In Persian]
- Mustawfi, M. b. N. b. A. B. (1957). Nazheh-ul-Qulob. (M. Debirsiaghi, Ed.). Tehran: Donyae Ketab. [In Persian]
- Naghash, S. (2021). Barrasi-ye 'avamel-e mo’th’er bar tose’e-ye naaftagi-ye khorasan-e jonubi (sal-ha-ye morad-e motale’e: 1397-1383) [Investigation of factors affecting the underdevelopment of South Khorasan (study years: 2004-2018)] (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Birjand, Iran. [In Persian]
- Odarkhani, M., Pourghasem Mianji, M., & Behbahani, Z. (2012). Naqsh-e farhang-e ta’amol va hamzisti dar erteqa-ye farhang-e 'omumi-ye shahrvandan (Motale’e-ye mardi: mantaghe-ye 3 tehran) [The role of the culture of interaction and coexistence in promoting the public culture of citizens: A Case study of region 3 of Tehran]. [Paper Presentation]. The First National Conference on Geography, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development. University of Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
- Oyekola, I. A. (2018). Culture and globalisation. In O. A. Ogunbameru, A. L. Adisa, & D. S. Adekeye (Eds.), Cross-cultural management: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach (pp. 81-102). Osun State: Obafemi Awolowo University Press.
- Raj, K. (2004). Is there really a relationship between culture and development. Anthropologist1(6), 37-43.
- Sabbaghpour, A. A. (2006). Tose’e-ye farhangi va sakhtar-e farhangi-ye Iran [Cultural development and cultural structure of Iran]. Strategy Quarterly, 1(42), 41-65. [In Persian]
- Studies of the Land Use Plan of South Khorasan province (2014). Birjand: South Khorasan Governorate, Deputy for Development, Management and Human Development. [In Persian]
- Taghvai, M., & Ghaed Rahmati, S. (2006). Tahlil-e shakhes-ha-ye tose’e-ye farhangi-ye ostan-ha-ye keshvar [Analysis of cultural development indicators of the country's provinces]. Regional Geography and Development Quarterly, 4(7), 117-132. [In Persian]
- Teng, F., Quoquab, F., Hussin, N., & Mohammad, J. (2016). Re-defining sustainable development values and its facets based on developing country perspective. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 1-13.
- Todaro, M. (1987). Economic development in the third world. (G. A. Farjadi, Trans. 5th ed.) Tehran: Publications of the Ministry of Planning and Budget.
- Vaggi, G. (2018). Towards a broader definition of development. In M. Nussbaum & C. Sunstein (Eds.), The global justice reader (pp. 25-49). New York: Springer.
- Vossoughi, M., Aram, H., & Salmani, G. (2012). Barrasi-ye mavane’-e sakhtari dar jahat-e sheklgiri va erteqa-ye tose’e-ye farhangi dar Iran, chalesh-ha va rahkar-ha [Investigating the structural barriers to the formation and promotion of cultural development in Iran, challenges and solutions]. Iranian Social Development Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 81-96. [In Persian]
- Ziari, K. (1999). Osul va ravesh-ha-ye barnamerizi-ye mantaghe’i [Regional planning principles and methods]. Yazd: Yazd University Press. [In Persian].

  • Receive Date 21 December 2022
  • Revise Date 28 May 2023
  • Accept Date 14 March 2023